---- begin included text ---- To: sam, talia From: tjpierce Subject: planning for the future, living for the present Timestamp: FRI 14 JUN 2137 13:21:46 I have some time before I have to take a meeting with our local rally master to dig up some insider election news, so I figured I'd use a bit of it to try and get myself organized. Let's start with the Legion, because, hey, who doesn't love a good (and unnecessarily gory) mystery? I'm going to start with some assumptions. Maybe a few of these will have to be discarded when more facts come in, but maybe not. At any rate, it'll give you an idea about the shape I think this particular story is taking, and the kinds of directions I think might be worth pursuing. This is the first big assumption: that the Legion is being both honest and correct when they say that Robin wasn't the suicidal type. I'm willing to believe that: not only do their reports seem to be consistent with that opinion (at least to my keen and thoroughly untrained medical eye), it doesn't make sense for her to kill herself. She was well on her way to getting a ticket out of the arcology, which is something she definitely wanted. She knew the Legion was more than willing to back her up if her parents or the arcology raised any static about it. From her v-mails, it sounds like she was doing a lot of reading about the Legion and wasn't even close to changing her mind about signing up with them. Assumption two: since she's not the suicidal type, someone else compelled her to kill herself. Someone who could influence her to do that without actually being in the room with her. Assumption number three might be a bit out there, and I expect a few quizzical looks from you guys when I share it with you. Hell, I'd give /myself/ a quizzical look for it, if that wouldn't give me eyestrain or a cerebral hemorrhage. But still, I'm going to say it: my third default assumption is that the S.C. arcology is not involved in Robin's death. Or that, at the very least, the security office of the S.C. arcology is not aware that the arcology is involved in Robin's death. I'll explain: they're absolutely panicked about the idea of bad publicity, right? And yet, here we are, looking at legal, seemingly untampered-with documents about a death that has BAD PUBLICITY in ten-foot-tall holographic script rotating and flashing all over it. Yeah, sure, they want to sweep this under the rug. They don't want headlines on it, or the hassle of saying "No comment" and "Our attorneys will be contacting you soon" to any journalist who might dare to ask them questions about it or to anyone who makes a comment peripherally related to it on the OpNet somewhere. But they're willing to let the Legion (or its informally-appointed snoops) take a look at the investigation anyway, and that to me says that they don't think they've got anything to lose. And guilty people, they always know that they have something to lose. So for now, at least, I'm going to go with "it's not the arcology." Yeah, I know, I can't believe I'm saying that, either. That place irritates the hell out of me. I just can't figure a way of scanning this that puts them in the driver's seat when Robin went over the cliff. Though I will point out a tantalizing possibility: the arcology's report on Robin's meeting with the Legion says that /they/, the arcology, found her "inappropriate for recruitment." As in, "hey, we just found out one of our residents is a latent psion, should we offer her a job?" That says to me that the arcology is interested in hiring some psions. And given the way they run their little compound over there, I'd be willing to bet the psions they'd most like to hire are telepaths. At least, until they can figure out another way to extend their security grid into the heads of their residents, right? Arcology security might be more than just one agent and a lot of surveillance gear, and there's no reason why that agent would necessarily be aware of that. But that's pure imagination, I've got nothing to back it up and don't have any reason to believe it right now. Assumption four is, thankfully, less disreputable: the Ministry's interest in this is aroused because it does look a lot like their area of expertise, and therefore they either need to make damn sure that it has absolutely nothing to do with one of their guys (and therefore unrelated to them in any bad-publicity kind of way), or they have a deep desire to settle on this badness themselves (and therefore offset potential bad publicity). In other words, it ain't them, and they want it settled even more than anyone else on the planet does. And that's the four basic assumptions I'm going to use to make this pitch: call it MIND versus MATTER, round one. We'll start with our VICTIM, played by Robin. She's stuck in a horrible, oppressive place that she hates, and she wants out. As our story begins, she's just been handed a chance to do exactly that: she's got herself a latent talent, and she's getting herself a ticket into the Legion as soon as she can be dunked in the appropriate tank. We'll call the horrible, oppressive place OCEANIA, and cast the S.C. arcology for that part. They'll love it--it's the role they were born to play. OCEANIA looks at VICTIM and says "we don't like her, and we won't miss her when she's gone, but while she's here she'd better not piss us off." VICTIM gives OCEANIA the finger and gets on with the process of getting the hell out of there. Enter THE SHADOW, who for some reason has decided that VICTIM should not be able to redeem her ticket out of OCEANIA. From at least one week prior to her death, THE SHADOW uses some kind of surreptitious mental influence to drive VICTIM over the edge. That last week is torturous...VICTIM cannot sleep, and the pressure on her keeps increasing. And, most tellingly, she seems to ask THE SHADOW "What do you want from me?!" A question, it seems, that may have been answered soon afterwards at the end of a knife. In fact, there are two ways to spin that part: the first is that, yes, the goal was to kill VICTIM, in such a way and under such circumstances that the local authorities would have no viable murder suspect and no reason to look for one. The second is that THE SHADOW botched the job: VICTIM was herself a latent telepath, as it turns out, and perhaps she really did kill herself in order to /not/ give THE SHADOW what it wanted. After all, it's not like VICTIM had anyone in OCEANIA she could go to for help. But this is obviously a very sketchy tale, because the audience can't see any motivations here. And that's fine, if all you want to see is the gore; any flimsy excuse works for that. But it's poor storytelling, and it makes the roles of THE SHADOW and VICTIM totally irrelevant. If we want this to be a better story, we need the motivations. We need a reason for THE SHADOW to be interested in VICTIM, and that means VICTIM needs to be something special. But, you say, we've already got that: she's a latent psion, that's pretty special. And maybe that's enough, I'll admit. But why /this/ latent psion in particular? The choice of VICTIM /could/ be random, but to me it plays as personal. THE SHADOW has to have a reason to notice VICTIM in particular, a reason to spend a week or more attacking her mind, a reason for this whole sordid tale to unfold the way it does. And since we can't put the cameras on THE SHADOW without giving away the ending, the focus will have to be on VICTIM. So here's the direction I see this one going: what we've got on Robin herself is just the barest outline. It's cookie-cutter angry misfit teenager stuff. She lives in a rotten, overly-restrictive environment and chafes at it. Her parents don't get her, and her home life is just more stress piled on what she's already carrying. That's easy to explain, but it doesn't actually TELL us anything, right? And I think it would help if we could figure out more about her. Big things like "did anyone investigate her /before/ she died?" and "who, specifically, knew she was a latent psion?" and "who came in contact with her that week before she died?" Me, I figure she had to have at least ONE friend or reasonably close acquaintance in that arcology, or her school record would have had more incidents on it than just a determination that she was rebellious and pissed off about living there. They would have given us a security file showing a bunch of bad things she'd done, so we'd be able to go "ah, an unstable juvenile delinquent" and nod sadly at that as if it could explain why she died. They didn't do that. I figure she had a safety valve somewhere, something she could do to get herself focused on a decent goal (namely, getting out of there) and therefore make random acts of resistance unnecessary. Maybe someone she could talk to, if we're lucky. Her parents are probably a poor choice for following that up. But friends, ah...friends are a better possibility, I think. If we could figure out a way to ask her friends what was up with her, we might be able to get some interesting answers. And I have a few ideas on how that might be done, all of which are guaranteed to make you guys uncomfortable! Me, I'd be willing to give it a shot, but let's be honest: me asking questions around the arcology is a recipe for bad trouble. Any of us asking is probably a recipe for bad trouble, for that matter, even if kindly Agent Norwood didn't know who we were. For one thing, we're too damn old to really get anywhere with the 18-20 year olds who might have known her best. Which got me to thinking... Talia, you've got your little cadre of foundlings, some of whom have legitimate birth records and no inconveniently low loyalty scores or burgeoning criminal records, right? And the arcology, as oppressive as it is, /does/ have a nice, upscale, kid-friendly mall which dearly loves to take money from outsiders, right? Or failing that, Sam, you've got your friend Rose whose criminal record may have been expunged as part of a sweet licensing deal, yeah? A smart, canny person with the right age and demeanour and no visible connection to us could maybe get the answers we can't. And so, you now see why I am using v-mail for this instead of telling you guys over dinner or something like that. If I asked you this in person, I'd expect to get punched. And I will admit that I am suggesting this course of action because I /am/ assuming that arcology security is not involved in Robin's death. I wouldn't suggest recruiting someone and sending them in there if I thought it was dangerous for them. I'm thinking that someone goes in after the arcology's schools let out, kicks around the mall food court for a few hours and asks a few surreptitious questions about Robin to get a better idea of who she was or what might have been going on in her life the week before she died, and then walks out. Think about it, okay? If you disagree, that's the end of it; we can always find other avenues to investigate. And seriously, don't punch me. I know that I'm straying into some very dangerous terrain by suggesting this, and you know I'm not doing it maliciously or thoughtlessly. It's just an option, and a simple "no" works just fine. One last thing occurs to me: I want very much to agree with our helpful Ministry liason that this has nothing to do with one of their guys. I don't want it to be one of their guys. I know that they say that the people they dunk simply don't go rogue, and I want to believe that. Hell, if any Order can claim to be able to suss out potential rogues before they go running off on their own, it'd be them, right? So I'm not, at this point, committed to the idea that what was pushing in on Robin /had/ to be telepathic. It seems like a possibility (especially given Baja), and I'll entertain it as such, but I'm looking for all the other possibilities, too. Could be Aberrant, after all. Could be alien. Could be something else entirely. I can honestly say that I'm not sure what's behind all this. But I am 100% /positive/ that the Ministry's interest in this is primarily centered on excluding the possibility that it has anything to do with telepathy as it is practiced by their dunk-ees. So I'm willing (and I think it's wise) to keep them in the loop on this, but only after we've gone as far with it as we can if what we're looking at seems to be pointing towards telepathy. It's not that I don't trust them, it's more that I'm aware that they have to pay close attention to their reputation, especially in the FSA, and that they will have to make that their main concern in this investigation. And that's not what I think this should be about. So, to sum up: I think we need to think about why someone would want Robin dead (or would want something from her that she would rather die than provide). I think that we should keep thinking about how what happened to Robin or to Talia's friends in Baja could have been accomplished (telepathy and any other possibilities). I think that the Ministry can help us, but shouldn't be the first people on our speed-dials. And, perhaps most importantly, I think I'd better wrap this up before I'm late for my meeting. Next time, maybe I'll take a swing at Baja, which is another tantalizing tale of mystery and intrigue.